From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEF5875424
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:24:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E6B17F8AA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:24:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id D1C91F89A
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:24:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A6D8146786
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:24:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <2cc57954-1fea-b023-c760-57ccd1e665c5@proxmox.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:24:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:90.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/90.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
References: <20210623124648.191520-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210623124648.191520-1-w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.642 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied:  [RFC docs] add a basic BTRFS section
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 20:24:28 -0000

On 23.06.21 14:46, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Please give some feedback as to what else to add/change/remove.
> 
>  local-btrfs.adoc       | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  pve-storage-btrfs.adoc |  55 +++++++++++++
>  pvesm.adoc             |   1 +
>  sysadmin.adoc          |   2 +
>  4 files changed, 235 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 local-btrfs.adoc
>  create mode 100644 pve-storage-btrfs.adoc
> 
>

applied,  thanks!

FYI: splitted out mounting in its own section, added a very small new section about
how to add an exisiting FS to PVE (basically just an example for `pvesm add ...`),
added BTRFS to the storage plugin overview table in pvesm.adoc and noted that this
all is a technology preview for now.