From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A157961454
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Feb 2022 15:03:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9521332A2E
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Feb 2022 15:03:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 850E332A22
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Feb 2022 15:03:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4B95441895
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri,  4 Feb 2022 15:03:50 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <27c5116c-47d6-7d1a-2b19-b3eb484cf9b1@proxmox.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:03:49 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Fabian_Gr=c3=bcnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20220203124143.1931377-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
 <20220203124143.1931377-19-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220203124143.1931377-19-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.137 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 NICE_REPLY_A           -0.001 Looks like a legit reply (A)
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 qemu-server 11/11] qm: add remote_migrate
 command
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 14:03:51 -0000

Am 03.02.22 um 13:41 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
> @@ -900,6 +1017,7 @@ our $cmddef = {
>      clone => [ "PVE::API2::Qemu", 'clone_vm', ['vmid', 'newid'], { node => $nodename }, $upid_exit ],
>  
>      migrate => [ "PVE::API2::Qemu", 'migrate_vm', ['vmid', 'target'], { node => $nodename }, $upid_exit ],
> +    remote_migrate => [ __PACKAGE__, 'remote_migrate_vm', ['vmid', 'target-vmid', 'target-endpoint'], { node => $nodename }, $upid_exit ],

Use 'remote-migrate' instead?

>  
>      set => [ "PVE::API2::Qemu", 'update_vm', ['vmid'], { node => $nodename } ],
>