From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69F9662B28 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:33:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5CB7422DA3 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:32:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2C7CD22D99 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:32:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id q18so11492279wrn.1 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 07:32:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=MMgIwq+LRGLqYZI60Gid69vHnOQULXy8ZloD67lVKBw=; b=NVilE9Fnk5cp3xXNCcwhyawNNAn0San+kK0YTXvyQyUPI+X1ptVU4xkZdbeYSl92+E nlBMlanNZw8mBqiwAQI5MtqhluFHL8WJ3mCuXVcYGtvTxtr9S1KEMjg9PHmHIt7pCQip 1spKX+kIAC2UZPHIjEuaRuKn/JBLV64GiAuc2Yui9d3q8A9mPf/jJ9p7VQbnER5NFPIg ex7yz9kmIN1slhTMv1v/fCP8XvHkSpb1BLyAOHBsijgh+Nk0yIuzRE3QmcZQzpIzPNHL OK8nLlMMFmLohOY6mfQyQgFCnA5aVW5Jq6PApc6dQWhHWepGGCA6bP4ZgoZoLgeeqKFh s4xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=MMgIwq+LRGLqYZI60Gid69vHnOQULXy8ZloD67lVKBw=; b=B764eAcpj0ZD4aCs+UujGG5NBPaRa/r/5+LZSKUkbw2Jo5mIcIvy7kwh612WzPOGoY 7lfuiFM/ZhATZrgqbt7/vCY/Hbj+LGtCBxQMXPbwWOfNfCrX1/izoBR1DiXVxgQLLl33 drjna96O+zeMVWaS84+iO6zhVaabovfURIVGAHCf9nCffM3d9mqXLsyLNqju4FGxq0TR l8wIziVBN4NPpquRdJtKG7lltKC+NKnG7CigqvaBfKNuw32N/rYvDl7LVWodi2/idZEI s3DxYijWdY02EHsfqctkX9kk8yFYyM6Tkp9aeUCeUzZlFhhty2908jvkKylw93RayA5O xyzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iVfnFPo1fAhBgJYt4JkysLmMHs8kr/6W3r4EbIN73ybxLgLwc MMStsUODb1zmzOJa3Z8LWLuESLyCnu+Yo43IKD0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJMLMC79V5NsG/O4YeL1aKnzj2qE2372uvXg2hZ/cfo6wdjFvHlb0qV8raeH/SvjrVJ1Eyvg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:5:: with SMTP id h5mr19254696wrx.153.1608564765716; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 07:32:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a0a:1580:0:1::100c? (ovpn1.odiso.net. [2a0a:1580:2000::3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e16sm29195938wra.94.2020.12.21.07.32.44 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 07:32:45 -0800 (PST) To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com References: <20201203073603.GA455757@mala.proxmox.com> From: alexandre derumier Message-ID: <26f40a2f-ae54-3971-afdb-b417057ecc82@odiso.com> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:32:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201203073603.GA455757@mala.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 1.649 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature NICE_REPLY_A -3.299 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] ovf duplicate AddressOnParent X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 15:33:23 -0000 On 03/12/2020 08:36, Dominic Jäger wrote: > Please try changing the AddressOnParent values so that they are unique. > As you mentioned, the disks should then be attached with different numbers scsi0, scsi1, scsi2... Hi, I wonder if the current proxmox ovs parser is not wrong. Seem than "adressOnParent" is the pci controller. So, it's working fine for nic,  but for disks , if ovf have multiple disks on same controller, it'll be always the same AddressOnParent. I'll to check with differents hypervisors ovf export to be sure.