From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E437E96568 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:30:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CCF216030 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:30:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:30:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CF30245EBF for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:30:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <225a50b5-2326-7205-1eab-a9cbd0b16fdd@proxmox.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:30:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/109.0 Content-Language: en-GB From: Thomas Lamprecht To: Proxmox VE development discussion , Lukas Wagner Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion References: <20230123131735.400368-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <20230123131735.400368-2-l.wagner@proxmox.com> <5d124158-1ce3-81b9-e1cd-60f4bc20b894@proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <5d124158-1ce3-81b9-e1cd-60f4bc20b894@proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 3.031 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment NICE_REPLY_A -1.148 Looks like a legit reply (A) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -5 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 widget-toolkit 1/1] repo view: replace non-clickable checkbox with icons X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:30:04 -0000 Am 24/01/2023 um 16:24 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: >> - dataIndex: 'Enabled', >> - listeners: { >> - beforecheckchange: () => false, // veto, we don't want to allow inline change - to subtle >> + dataindex: 'Enabled', >> + align: 'center', >> + renderer: function(enabled, cell, record) { >> + return Proxmox.Utils.render_enabled_icon(record.data.Enabled); >> }, > could be a one liner without losing clarity: > > renderer: ({data}) => Proxmox.Utils.renderEnabledIcon(data.Enabled), > Actually, as in my reply to 2/2, you break setting dataIndex by writing it all lowercase, as otherwise you should be able to configure the renderer function directly, without intermediate call