From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6894562917 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:26:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5E9BB19D4B for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:26:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 4BA2819D35 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:26:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id o24so3026861wmh.5 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:26:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=odiso-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version; bh=yxT16VHF7XPg/AV0qBuHXmJtMbtAL5rYaAcnb/+tgOE=; b=evyoOb60kCtYlZrXea4YPqDbaJtSssUNqL/KzldCsUDL+wPJ3ER+4JIlByoG8LIRUw ioIIDJQ/fK9AAM4Bj2QedFmZa06X+9wxpHNBSkI2mccLt0YXNQ6b5+CfreN/cjkfguPG +TeICqo5uayNzoFzmO6TZ9dIM2Q3jAi6KnD8GR1aNFd92HuSaC4abPLF6zNjZZ888mvV FHvFHRpkYkH1bf7orlJxt/n1mpIjUUcstrWbYTvdZuz0IchGYOi81HVA0FvtCadjKKgV 8CnEypLUbh3tEWD8KSRSt6y4/9xBioHovnabvnr4xBhZgm3gdjXDffh43SJ9ei8utuzf hBUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=yxT16VHF7XPg/AV0qBuHXmJtMbtAL5rYaAcnb/+tgOE=; b=Rsjp3Ur4Ep71Wtb3UPNWGjY9xmdL5aL76HqhEQoDsva1MvvS8KkEZCtDKMcatOyvSG mmFRt42XI7PNej0JfItAnoo3jqaUsKb1VHru6Enjfdp/kFI3ORTwANFyktX80YCysqXF lnWyvd1lFDuKoA66lj4gI3ZRuR6m97GtcD0RimxcWLCxdV/ECb/a7GF3ojaOcHwiPCEg 2gkx5SDkW3JJRUNLTluuj5hzb/8o/kiyiJB/vipkGJLuao+yjCpNz/s5xEb+TN/4eTmG xnWu8E8Tz84RggumiUjLjhHD6g5ErfMW9GJvtlpS+I+35D2zBjW3U7lh082PLuCt9nXf i0fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532K1lQ+ZISM7qGOFQj5VgcfYeWOSYgkIdyDW4tBkICbrmW6+dGJ tyyQ/jlLbJvWmgP2AxxNioa3GH9oKWfvNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLgl+t+OXk7IwuJ0eVfv0DgfPpL7HR9eW7pp2eBP7mlLr4hJl2pqV2ou7b4PQ/YhNpYfNvMA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3588:: with SMTP id p8mr10951973wmq.71.1612707963029; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a0a:1580:0:1::100c? (ovpn1.odiso.net. [2a0a:1580:2000::3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 143sm15047473wmb.47.2021.02.07.06.26.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 06:26:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2152596439f0b75bc21760ab35c739dc16ea92c2.camel@odiso.com> From: aderumier@odiso.com To: Thomas Lamprecht , Proxmox VE development discussion Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:26:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <139fcda1-d725-d847-b11b-9c35941ba6f4@proxmox.com> References: <20210105093536.1727641-1-aderumier@odiso.com> <139fcda1-d725-d847-b11b-9c35941ba6f4@proxmox.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.133 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network 00/15] bugfix && unit tests X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:26:10 -0000 Le samedi 06 février 2021 à 14:57 +0100, Thomas Lamprecht a écrit : > applied all but this one: > > >   tests: add subnets tests > > as my build fails with it (see reply to that patch) > > much much thanks for the work here! > Thanks for your time for the review! could it be possible to apply pve-cluster patches to handle new cfg files ?