From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3949D6900B for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:18:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1E6EB231B3 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [89.248.211.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 45E6C231A6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC6A15FA5EC; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id sWZVlneedA1H; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D315E15FA5ED; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailpro.odiso.com Received: from mailpro.odiso.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailpro.odiso.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id XjpydH4e_LZL; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailpro.odiso.net (mailpro.odiso.net [10.1.31.111]) by mailpro.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC7B15FA5EC; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:17:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexandre DERUMIER To: Thomas Lamprecht Cc: pve-devel Message-ID: <2143761721.158442.1598624256546.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200827111655.22957-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> <110ea3a0-4076-96fa-b31b-aca0188ed2bb@proxmox.com> <1844854487.155436.1598619062646.JavaMail.zimbra@odiso.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3866 (ZimbraWebClient - GC83 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3844) Thread-Topic: sdn patches ready for review Thread-Index: qiEwMzJfZYT42z4l9M/cXsjz7yReJw== X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.047 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: Re: [pve-devel] sdn patches ready for review X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 14:18:09 -0000 >>OK. Do you already use this new stuff somewhere in your setups?=20 Not yet. (we are going to migrate all our cluster to bgp-evpn in coming mon= ths, but I'm waiting the subnet management, as I have move the gateway ip d= efinition in subnet) =20 Currently at work, we manage ipam (netbox) /dns (powerdns) for vm creation = with some custom scripts + puppet plugged to ipam to generate guestos confi= g. But when I'll be ready, I'm going to use them with proxmox directly. It still need work to add ip management on lxc but also qemu. (I don't use yet cloud-init in production, but I'm currently playing with i= t,I'm able to reload online config with some udev tricks,...) ----- Mail original ----- De: "Thomas Lamprecht" =C3=80: "aderumier" Cc: "pve-devel" Envoy=C3=A9: Vendredi 28 Ao=C3=BBt 2020 15:09:29 Objet: Re: sdn patches ready for review Hi,=20 On 8/28/20 2:51 PM, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:=20 > Hi everybody,=20 >=20 > I think my summer work on sdn is ready for review.=20 > I have implemented subnet/nat/ipam/dns registration.=20 cool!=20 >=20 > I'll stop to add new feature for now, I have planned time in september fo= r fixes,cleanup.=20 Ok, thanks for the information! I'll allocate a few hours next week to give= =20 initial feedback.=20 I already skimmed each iteration of your patches shallowly, nothing made an= y=20 alarm bells ring, so from what I can tell now, it should head in the right= =20 directions.=20 The features are definitively nice and I think many PVE users would like to= have=20 them quite a bit.=20 > Here the different patch series:=20 >=20 >=20 > [pve-devel] [PATCH v7 pve-network 00/21] sdn : add subnets management=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044850.html=20 >=20 > [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 pve-manager 0/8] sdn : add subnets management=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044775.html=20 >=20 >=20 > [pve-devel] [PATCH v4 pve-cluster 0/4] sdn : add subnets management=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044770.html=20 >=20 > [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-docs 0/2] simple zone + subnet/ipam documentati= on=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044874.html=20 >=20 >=20 > For testing subnet/ipam in lxc (is really a poc, do not apply) ->=20 >=20 > [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-container] POC : add/del/update ip from vnet-su= bnet-ipam=20 > https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2020-August/044781.html=20 >=20 > Currently, if you use a vnet with subnet with registered ipam, and you ke= ep the ip field empty, it'll auto-assign an ip.=20 > (or you can still defined your own ip, it'll be registered in pam too)=20 >=20 >=20 OK. Do you already use this new stuff somewhere in your setups?=20