From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1492860790
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:00:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 12CD6DC3F
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:00:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [212.186.127.180])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 1ACB6DBDE
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:00:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D50C145C3D
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:00:27 +0100 (CET)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
 Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20201126075825.11727-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Message-ID: <20c9d41f-295d-4fed-0c97-f92847ea3089@proxmox.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 11:00:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/83.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201126075825.11727-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.078 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED        -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/,
 medium trust
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH manager] ui: storage: find the correct
 storage record
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 10:00:29 -0000

On 26.11.20 08:58, Dominik Csapak wrote:
> by default, findRecord only anchors at the beginning, e.g.
> findRecord('id', 'foo');
> could find either an entry with id 'foo', 'foobar', 'foobaz', etc.
> 
> extend the call to set 'exactMatch' to true, else we sometimes
> used the content types of storage e.g., 'local-lvm' for showing
> the panels for 'local'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
> ---
> this is the most stupid interface i could imagine for something
> called 'findRecord'... i'll go ahead and check where we use this,
> and try to see if we need to change it there as well...
> 
>  www/manager6/storage/Browser.js | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
>

applied, thanks!