From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (gate001.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a0f:8001:1:32::40]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6151FF0A8 for ; Sat, 05 Sep 2026 05:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gate001.proxmox.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate001.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E5C9E215FA; Sat, 05 Sep 2026 05:07:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Cole Hughes To: c.hughes@proxmox.com, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH network v2 3/3] sdn: removing ASN number Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 23:06:59 -0400 Message-ID: <20260905030730.24660-4-c.hughes@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.1 In-Reply-To: <20260905030730.24660-1-c.hughes@proxmox.com> References: <20260905030730.24660-1-c.hughes@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1788577652625 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.001 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment (newer systems) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -2.3 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: 4JRJXFAJPVO4AO33MP2CCZWIQO2DFR7K X-Message-ID-Hash: 4JRJXFAJPVO4AO33MP2CCZWIQO2DFR7K X-MailFrom: c.hughes@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: ASN is the acronym for Autonomous System Number. "ASN number" is redundant. Signed-off-by: Cole Hughes --- changes since v1: - no changes --- src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/Plugin.pm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/Plugin.pm b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/Plugin.pm index 6da3eec..6d6b974 100644 --- a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/Plugin.pm +++ b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/Plugin.pm @@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ needs to always use the EVPN ASN in its router definition to ensure correct generation for Route Targets (if not using the autort patch). The FRR config generation logic utilizes the local-as directive for specifying -alternate ASN numbers. Since local-as is only applicable for eBGP sessions, the -internal ASN number always needs to be used for the router definition. So if +alternate ASNs. Since local-as is only applicable for eBGP sessions, the +internal ASN always needs to be used for the router definition. So if there are no EVPN controllers, but iBGP BGP sessions, utilize the ASN configured there. -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)