From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0916D1FF14C for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:34:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8837912F53; Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:34:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Hanreich To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Subject: [PATCH pve-manager 4/5] fabrics: wireguard: add mtu to interface properties Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:33:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20260626133357.274255-5-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 In-Reply-To: <20260626133357.274255-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20260626133357.274255-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1782480837123 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.592 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Message-ID-Hash: LOWQMVW3MRP2BJPWKD65576EJMADQR6Y X-Message-ID-Hash: LOWQMVW3MRP2BJPWKD65576EJMADQR6Y X-MailFrom: s.hanreich@proxmox.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: The minimum value of 576 is based on the minimum datagram size a node must be able to handle, as according to RFC 791. In practice, MTU values should be significantly higher anyway. Make 1420 a soft-default by prefilling the MTU field. This allows for making it the de-facto default without breaking the current behavior of the API. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich --- www/manager6/sdn/fabrics/wireguard/InterfacePanel.js | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/www/manager6/sdn/fabrics/wireguard/InterfacePanel.js b/www/manager6/sdn/fabrics/wireguard/InterfacePanel.js index 80fe6919f..1969ceced 100644 --- a/www/manager6/sdn/fabrics/wireguard/InterfacePanel.js +++ b/www/manager6/sdn/fabrics/wireguard/InterfacePanel.js @@ -368,6 +368,14 @@ Ext.define('PVE.sdn.Fabric.WireGuard.InterfacePanel', { emptyText: '2001:db8::1/64', isFormField: false, }, + { + fieldLabel: gettext('MTU'), + bind: '{selectedInterface.mtu}', + xtype: 'proxmoxintegerfield', + minValue: 576, + maxValue: 65535, + isFormField: false, + }, { xtype: 'pveSDNWireGuardPeerSelector', reference: 'peerSelector', @@ -413,6 +421,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.sdn.Fabric.WireGuard.InterfacePanel', { peers: [], listen_port: listenPort, isCreate: true, + mtu: 1420, }); let interfaceGrid = me.lookupReference('interfaceGrid'); -- 2.47.3