From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043E41FF145 for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:02:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 21AFE17E83; Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:02:17 +0100 (CET) From: Dominik Csapak To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:58:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20260122140143.2256222-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.032 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 0/4] ui: improve ux for nested pools X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" by * allowing to select a parent pool when creating * showing nested pools in the tree as such patch 1/4 is just a cleanup i noticed during development, and can be applied independently patch 4/4 is potentially confusing for users, since it might happen they confuse some pools, for example: 'foo/bar' with 'bar' since both will be shown as 'bar' in the tree when nesting is enabled. Because of this, i sent it seperately and we can decide independently if we want that without a new version (feel free to squash that patch into the previous one if desired) Dominik Csapak (4): ui: tree: don't show empty grouping nodes as expandable ui: pool create: allow selecting parent pool via selector ui: tree: show nested pools in a nested way ui: tree: render nested pool names without parent pools www/manager6/UIOptions.js | 1 + www/manager6/Workspace.js | 5 ++- www/manager6/dc/PoolEdit.js | 48 ++++++++++++++++++------- www/manager6/tree/ResourceTree.js | 36 +++++++++++++++---- www/manager6/window/TreeSettingsEdit.js | 13 +++++++ 5 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel