From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35AE81FF15E for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:51:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CB5452262A; Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:51:55 +0100 (CET) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 11:51:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20260121105145.47010-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1768992655949 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.017 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [qemuserver.pm, abstractmigrate.pm, migrate.pm, qemumigrate.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES guest-common/qemu-server/container 0/3] fix #3229: migrate: consider node restriction for 'shared' storage X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Previously, volumes on a storage with the 'shared' marker were assumed to not need storage migration and migration would fail when checking for storage availability on the target. But if a storage with a 'shared' marker has node restrictions, this is wrong. Fix the issue by checking whether a storage with the 'shared' marker is actually available on the target node and otherwise properly consider the volume a local volume. A new map_storage() helper does apply the mapping also for shared storages if they are not configured for the target node. Package dependencies: qemu-server depends and build-depends on new libpve-guest-common-perl pve-container depends on new libpve-guest-common-perl guest-common: Fiona Ebner (1): abstract migrate: add map_storage() helper src/PVE/AbstractMigrate.pm | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) qemu-server: Fiona Ebner (1): fix #3229: migrate: consider node restriction for 'shared' storage src/PVE/QemuMigrate.pm | 14 +++----------- src/PVE/QemuServer.pm | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) container: Fiona Ebner (1): fix #3229: migrate: consider node restriction for 'shared' storage src/PVE/LXC/Migrate.pm | 23 ++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) Summary over all repositories: 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) -- Generated by git-murpp 0.5.0 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel