From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97BB1FF16B for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:17:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EB2A7221B; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:17:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Hannes Laimer To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:16:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20250912101646.21362-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1757672212879 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.028 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager] ui: ha: consider status/presence of qdevice for warning X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" We showed this warning for setups with two nodes and a qdevice, but for setups like this this warning didn't make Sense. This checks if a qdevice is connected to the cluster before showing the 'not enough votes for reliable HA'-warning. Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer --- This came up in support[1]. [1] https://my.proxmox.com/en/dbsfk/ticket/view/20332 www/manager6/ha/ResourceEdit.js | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/www/manager6/ha/ResourceEdit.js b/www/manager6/ha/ResourceEdit.js index 428672a8..04795da7 100644 --- a/www/manager6/ha/ResourceEdit.js +++ b/www/manager6/ha/ResourceEdit.js @@ -54,7 +54,18 @@ Ext.define('PVE.ha.VMResourceInputPanel', { }); if (votes < MIN_QUORUM_VOTES) { - fewVotesHint.setVisible(true); + Proxmox.Utils.API2Request({ + url: '/cluster/config/qdevice', + method: 'GET', + failure: function (response) { + fewVotesHint.setVisible(true); + }, + success: function (response) { + let qdeviceStatus = response.result.data; + let qdeviceConnected = qdeviceStatus.State === 'Connected'; + fewVotesHint.setVisible(!qdeviceConnected); + }, + }); } }, }); -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel