From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90031FF16B for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:54:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A105725C67; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:54:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Maximiliano Sandoval To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:53:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20250912075341.109185-1-m.sandoval@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bm-Milter-Handled: 55990f41-d878-4baa-be0a-ee34c49e34d2 X-Bm-Transport-Timestamp: 1757663617916 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.100 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [proxmox.com] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v2 1/2] lvm storage: state snapshot-as-volume-chain is a technology preview X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" This matches the description in the Changelog for Proxmox VE 9 [1]. [1] https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Roadmap#Proxmox_VE_9.0 Signed-off-by: Maximiliano Sandoval --- Differences from v1: - Document that snapshots as volume chain cannot be used with TPM images pve-storage-lvm.adoc | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/pve-storage-lvm.adoc b/pve-storage-lvm.adoc index 6928330..fc2a8ef 100644 --- a/pve-storage-lvm.adoc +++ b/pve-storage-lvm.adoc @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ The snapshot functionality is managed by the PVE storage system. + Enabling or disabling this flag only affects newly created virtual disk volumes. +WARNING: Snapshots as volume chains are currently a **technology preview** in {pve}. + .Configuration Example (`/etc/pve/storage.cfg`) ---- lvm: myspace -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel