From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39F131FF17C for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 18:46:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 264BEA148; Wed, 28 May 2025 18:46:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Aaron Lauterer To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 18:46:29 +0200 Message-Id: <20250528164630.2204379-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20250528164630.2204379-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20250528164630.2204379-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.030 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v1 2/3] ui: CephInstallWizard: add option and hint for offline repository X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" The new 'offline' repository option will not try to configure the Ceph repositories during installation. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer Tested-by: Christoph Heiss --- Notes: changes since RFC: * renamed option from 'offline' to 'manual' and therefore adapted the dropdown name and explanation text. www/manager6/ceph/CephInstallWizard.js | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/www/manager6/ceph/CephInstallWizard.js b/www/manager6/ceph/CephInstallWizard.js index ad7dac68..398c39df 100644 --- a/www/manager6/ceph/CephInstallWizard.js +++ b/www/manager6/ceph/CephInstallWizard.js @@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ Ext.define('PVE.ceph.CephInstallWizard', { return allSub ? gettext("Cluster has active subscriptions and would be eligible for using the enterprise repository.") : gettext("The no-subscription repository is not the best choice for production setups."); + } else if (repo === "manual") { + return gettext("The manual repository option expects that the repository is already configured. For example, in combination with the Promox Offline Mirror."); } else { return gettext('The test repository should only be used for test setups or after consulting the official Proxmox support!'); } @@ -322,6 +324,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.ceph.CephInstallWizard', { ['enterprise', gettext('Enterprise (recommended)')], ['no-subscription', gettext('No-Subscription')], ['test', gettext('Test')], + ['manual', gettext('Manual')], ], labelWidth: 150, submitValue: false, -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel