From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B07D1FF16F for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 27 May 2025 18:13:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5DF801B978; Tue, 27 May 2025 18:13:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 18:12:38 +0200 Message-Id: <20250527161243.918116-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.064 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH zfsonlinux 0/5] port some changes from salsa.d.o X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> The following patch-series is the result of diffing debian/ with the version on salsa, and checking for commits in debian-upstream that might make sense to port over (if only to keep our delta to debian small). most patches are house-keeping to minimize our delta. PATCH 1/5 might be relevant (see the linked bugs.d.o report), but afaict the deletion is racy and does not happen often. Tested by comparing the resulting deb-packages with the ones without the patches via diffoscope, and running the package on 2 VMs with replication and ztest. Stoiko Ivanov (5): cherry-pick usr-merge fix for libzfs6linux d/: move some tools out of /usr/sbin and add links for compatibility usr-merge: synchronize debian/ with upstream d/control: record conflict with nordugrid-arc-client d/lintian-overrides: adapt to renamed tags debian/control | 2 +- debian/libzfs6linux.postrm | 15 +++++++++++++++ debian/libzfs6linux.preinst | 16 ++++++++++++++++ debian/libzfslinux-dev.install.in | 2 +- debian/rules | 8 -------- .../usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/zdev | 12 ++++++------ debian/zfs-test.lintian-overrides | 4 ++-- debian/zfsutils-linux.install | 6 +++--- debian/zfsutils-linux.links | 3 +++ debian/zfsutils-linux.lintian-overrides | 11 ++++++----- 10 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) create mode 100644 debian/libzfs6linux.postrm create mode 100644 debian/libzfs6linux.preinst -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel