From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E38531FF16F
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:37:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 93242AC84;
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:37:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 13:36:42 +0200
Message-Id: <20250429113646.25738-3-f.weber@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250429113646.25738-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
References: <20250429113646.25738-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.008 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [lvmplugin.pm, gitlab.com, proxmox.com]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage v3 2/3] fix #4997: lvm: create:
disable autoactivation for new logical volumes
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
When discovering a new volume group (VG), for example on boot, LVM
triggers autoactivation. With the default settings, this activates all
logical volumes (LVs) in the VG. Activating an LV creates a
device-mapper device and a block device under /dev/mapper.
This is not necessarily problematic for local LVM VGs, but it is
problematic for VGs on top of a shared LUN used by multiple cluster
nodes (accessed via e.g. iSCSI/Fibre Channel/direct-attached SAS).
Concretely, in a cluster with a shared LVM VG where an LV is active on
nodes 1 and 2, deleting the LV on node 1 will not clean up the
device-mapper device on node 2. If an LV with the same name is
recreated later, the leftover device-mapper device will cause
activation of that LV on node 2 to fail with:
> device-mapper: create ioctl on [...] failed: Device or resource busy
Hence, certain combinations of guest removal (and thus LV removals)
and node reboots can cause guest creation or VM live migration (which
both entail LV activation) to fail with the above error message for
certain VMIDs, see bug #4997 for more information [1].
To avoid this issue in the future, disable autoactivation when
creating new LVs using the `--setautoactivation` flag. With this
setting, LVM autoactivation will not activate these LVs, and the
storage stack will take care of activating/deactivating the LV on the
correct node when needed.
This additionally fixes an issue with multipath on FC/SAS-attached
LUNs where LVs would be activated too early after boot when multipath
is not yet available, see [3] for more details and current workaround.
The `--setautoactivation` flag was introduced with LVM 2.03.12 [2],
Bookworm/PVE 8 ships 2.03.16.
Note that the flag is only set for newly created LVs, so LVs created
before this patch can still trigger #4997. To avoid this, users will
be advised to run a script to disable autoactivation for existing LVs.
[1] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4997
[2] https://gitlab.com/lvmteam/lvm2/-/blob/main/WHATS_NEW
[3] https://pve.proxmox.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Multipath&oldid=12039#FC/SAS-specific_configuration
Signed-off-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
---
Notes:
probably need to wait until PVE 9 for applying this, see cover letter
changes since v2:
- reworded commit message
new in v2
src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
index b371b4c..6a22f3e 100644
--- a/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
@@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ sub lvcreate {
'--yes',
'--size', $size,
'--name', $name,
+ '--setautoactivation', 'n',
];
for my $tag (@$tags) {
push @$cmd, '--addtag', $tag;
--
2.39.5
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel