From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEFB51FF16F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:59:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ECF19A18C;
	Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:59:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:50:45 +0200
Message-Id: <20250415135045.255272-28-d.kral@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250415135045.255272-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
References: <20250415135045.255272-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.013 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH container v3 11/11] mount: raw/iso: use volume
 content type assertion helpers
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Make use of the newly introduced content type assertion helpers at
verifying the content type when mounting mountpoints, which have the
format "raw" or "iso".

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
---
changes since v2:
  * rename helper from *_supported to *_available

I already pointed that out in a response to a v2 patch, but this already
existing check in __mountpoint_mount will make it impossible AFAICS for
users to move out of the error state of a root disk / mountpoint being
on a storage that doesn't support the content type 'rootdir'. But this
would be a follow-up if we want to change it.

Also there is no check for subvols made here, i.e. container root disks
/ mountpoints on a ZFS pool can be started fine, while ones on e.g.
directory storages cannot (because they are 'raw').

And on another note: The error message from this is rather cryptic for
an end user and is only a little bit clarified in the output of `pct
start ... --debug`, but else the user must guess:

run_buffer: 571 Script exited with status 25
lxc_init: 845 Failed to run lxc.hook.pre-start for container "101"
__lxc_start: 2034 Failed to initialize container "101"
TASK ERROR: startup for container '101' failed

I skipped adding a patch for this now, as it's out of scope of this
already long patch series.

 src/PVE/LXC.pm | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC.pm b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
index 799aa9a..0beb49c 100644
--- a/src/PVE/LXC.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/LXC.pm
@@ -1978,17 +1978,17 @@ sub __mountpoint_mount {
 		}
 	    };
 	    my $use_loopdev = 0;
-	    if ($scfg->{content}->{rootdir}) {
-		if ($scfg->{path}) {
-		    $mounted_dev = run_with_loopdev($domount, $path, $readonly);
-		    $use_loopdev = 1;
-		} else {
-		    $mounted_dev = $path;
-		    &$domount($path);
-		}
+
+	    PVE::Storage::assert_content_type_available($storage_cfg, $storage, 'rootdir');
+
+	    if ($scfg->{path}) {
+		$mounted_dev = run_with_loopdev($domount, $path, $readonly);
+		$use_loopdev = 1;
 	    } else {
-		die "storage '$storage' does not support containers\n";
+		$mounted_dev = $path;
+		&$domount($path);
 	    }
+
 	    return wantarray ? ($path, $use_loopdev, $mounted_dev) : $path;
 	} else {
 	    die "unsupported image format '$format'\n";
-- 
2.39.5



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel