From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4EA1FF16F
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:12:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 653D53FD3D;
	Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:12:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 09:11:21 +0200
Message-Id: <20250415071123.36921-1-d.kral@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [disks.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [RFC storage v2 1/3] api: smart: return unknown health
 instead of error message
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

In case of an error, the WebGUI expects the SMART data API endpoint to
return a health value, but it will return an error message directly. To
make this more user friendly, mask the error in the API handler.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
---
This could also have been intentional as the error message is passed to
the CLI and API response correctly, which is why it is a RFC.

 src/PVE/API2/Disks.pm | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/Disks.pm b/src/PVE/API2/Disks.pm
index 408bdbe..fe8d08e 100644
--- a/src/PVE/API2/Disks.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/API2/Disks.pm
@@ -216,7 +216,9 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
 
 	my $disk = PVE::Diskmanage::verify_blockdev_path($param->{disk});
 
-	my $result = PVE::Diskmanage::get_smart_data($disk, $param->{healthonly});
+	my $result = eval {
+	    PVE::Diskmanage::get_smart_data($disk, $param->{healthonly})
+	};
 
 	$result->{health} = 'UNKNOWN' if !defined $result->{health};
 	$result = { health => $result->{health} } if $param->{healthonly};
-- 
2.39.5



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel