From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC1B1FF187
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed,  9 Apr 2025 00:15:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9C9FD365EF;
	Wed,  9 Apr 2025 00:15:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed,  9 Apr 2025 00:15:13 +0200
Message-Id: <20250408221514.61100-3-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250408221514.61100-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
References: <20250408221514.61100-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.385 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery
 methods POISEN_SPAM_PILL          0.1 Meta: its spam
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_1        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3        0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
 Validity was blocked. See
 https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
 information.
 RDNS_NONE 0.793 Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_NONE                0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [evpnplugin.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-network v2 2/2] frr: enable and start frr on
 reloading the controller config
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

Since we now ship frr with Proxmox VE, the frr service is available on
the nodes but disabled on install. Prior to that, users had to
manually install frr, which automatically enabled the service. When
first applying a SDN configuration with an EVPN controller, we always
fell back to restarting the frr service, because reloading fails when
the daemon isn't running. This fallback to restarting leads to the
service running but still being in the disabled state. This means that
the EVPN setup is working until the next reboot. To avoid the
situation where users configure an EVPN controller and everything
seems to be working, until a restart breaks the EVPN setup,
additionally enable and start the frr service before trying to reload
the configuration.

We enable the service after checking for the existence of
frr-pythontools in order to avoid the situation where users apply an
SDN configuration with an EVPN controller, but reloading fails due to
a missing frr-pythontools package. Since we do an early return there,
we never fell back to restarting the service in case frr-pythontools
was not available. If we enabled the service before the check, the
configuration would apply after a reboot since it already got written
to the frr configuration file.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
---
 src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/EvpnPlugin.pm | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/EvpnPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/EvpnPlugin.pm
index 535c1e6..5b1a9aa 100644
--- a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/EvpnPlugin.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/EvpnPlugin.pm
@@ -625,6 +625,9 @@ sub reload_controller {
 	return;
     }
 
+    run_command(['systemctl', 'enable', '--now', 'frr'])
+	if !-e "/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/frr.service";
+
     my $err = sub {
 	my $line = shift;
 	if ($line =~ /ERROR:/) {
-- 
2.39.5


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel