From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA54B1FF16E for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 16:00:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 770EA7822; Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:59:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1743429589; x=1744034389; d=canarybit.eu; s=rsa2; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from; bh=aoYe9SQW1AXss/Te92qdgFejewdK7O/QbcM3liydMAc=; b=eqY5Wnm+Z5DMNjXbCe8ydIKUfWCKCHNt4hFYu/kZQmQnu+JJxT+U9dzdj3iwSR6SA00vaQGtGEMXF qItkp9Rid09nlTi3B2SVx1LWdhCduZn64GIrQxIxiSrPW+7Q1rwEz7iCmraE8DOateC8wDM3ikWyaa bJ9Nnoxkvc3EsMxS3vR0nHe6k4VrRs9dwDlKcDkjZLx3LKmdm6pxxl4HtSZVcT86OUKqsWtJqCUpko MR36Ms80732KVxVeK6wqdAkRyG/YSE4gTBRdo7ZIMHb821k7tebudDqCAoPBAWPxTjInQ81C4H1rws iAkRbDSsv7lyHQ4S4zzkSLt0arN38Pg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1743429589; x=1744034389; d=canarybit.eu; s=ed2; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from; bh=aoYe9SQW1AXss/Te92qdgFejewdK7O/QbcM3liydMAc=; b=VdSDdvcWKd7Vv5u9uktq5FgfEmhxpMMwxPkeM06VF9IBejAcVXKXAgej32qGARrXVbgYfhKKzQCy9 HRuN3CNDw== X-HalOne-ID: 6729e2a3-0e38-11f0-bd48-2b8368a4d5c5 From: Philipp Giersfeld <philipp.giersfeld@canarybit.eu> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:59:27 +0200 Message-Id: <20250331135931.50568-1-philipp.giersfeld@canarybit.eu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.134 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH edk2-firmware/qemu-server/manager v5 0/4] AMD SEV-SNP X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> This patch series adds support for AMD SEV-SNP. Where possible it mimics the existing support for AMD SEV(-ES). Running SEV-SNP VMs requires a specific OVMF firmware image. Contrary to other setups, SEV-SNP does not support loading the firmware via pflash. Instead, the firmware image is loaded via the -bios option. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel