From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02CEF1FF15E for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:05:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 66E6314337; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:05:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1741705514; x=1742310314; d=canarybit.eu; s=rsa2; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from; bh=NM3r6KDeCwyooIVgLirGfeH2yj6ZCDuMiRPAi3z5C7E=; b=CUYqGglvWZWDJSU5lrj8h0vpxxjPf8A4Z+DbEiKx7wUrUf3xY/Wq4ibOXfus13M4x6cWyS855nasm f9zXbrsuaBGDGP9GiWJog1a18yf8yQ17Owm3Q4qO6KzTcckNBwMCNJl7N2gV0EgucwBlCocqe+HgrI T20BZ77LRsQfk2/8ZkzGdHCMd4WnEVCHvWNhZVSMfsoHIvOM2Vpb1/lFklJrniebwpAsjHiFg3Y827 pUGOh3EJ61neM+lIV0Rd9h8YB9A4GqFahw5hgG4ayM39J4zK2/HFayEWjYVsdMr97ypPZukaY0C9mt fmpFrkp8ngPuaJQORvdzwS+iD1M2Hig== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1741705514; x=1742310314; d=canarybit.eu; s=ed2; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from; bh=NM3r6KDeCwyooIVgLirGfeH2yj6ZCDuMiRPAi3z5C7E=; b=BlD6H6Q+Box4GYIcXxTm43Bo0FtaODVmGa62OcBQmQualMsht/oRo2rY7w7pZX1AAMEivEWAGImhp KZ/3RdTDw== X-HalOne-ID: 33f76bb6-fe8a-11ef-9e27-d7c209f8bd06 From: Philipp Giersfeld <philipp.giersfeld@canarybit.eu> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:04:52 +0100 Message-Id: <20250311150456.4071232-1-philipp.giersfeld@canarybit.eu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.160 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [canarybit.eu] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH edk2-firmware/qemu-server/manager v3 0/4] AMD SEV-SNP X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> This patch series adds support for AMD SEV-SNP. Where possible it mimics the existing support for AMD SEV(-ES). Running SEV-SNP VMs requires a more recent version of edk2 and OVMF firmware image. Contrary to other setups, SEV-SNP does not support loading the firmware via pflash. Instead, the firmware image is loaded via the -bios option. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel