From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C0D11FF176
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Fri,  7 Mar 2025 10:53:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6835117556;
	Fri,  7 Mar 2025 10:53:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri,  7 Mar 2025 10:52:45 +0100
Message-Id: <20250307095245.65698-4-f.weber@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250307095245.65698-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
References: <20250307095245.65698-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.009 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage v2 3/3] fix #4997: lvm: create:
 disable autoactivation for new logical volumes
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

When discovering a new volume group (VG), for example on boot, LVM
triggers autoactivation. With the default settings, this activates all
logical volumes (LVs) in the VG. Activating an LV creates a
device-mapper device and a block device under /dev/mapper.

This is not necessarily problematic for local LVM VGs, but it is
problematic for VGs on top of a shared LUN used by multiple cluster
nodes (accessed via e.g. iSCSI/Fibre Channel/direct-attached SAS).

Concretely, in a cluster with a shared LVM VG where an LV is active on
nodes 1 and 2, deleting the LV on node 1 will not clean up the
device-mapper device on node 2. If an LV with the same name is
recreated later, the leftover device-mapper device will cause
activation of that LV on node 2 to fail with:

> device-mapper: create ioctl on [...] failed: Device or resource busy

Hence, certain combinations of guest removal (and thus LV removals)
and node reboots can cause guest creation or VM live migration (which
both entail LV activation) to fail with the above error message for
certain VMIDs, see bug #4997 for more information [1].

To avoid this issue in the future, disable autoactivation when
creating new LVs using the `--setautoactivation` flag. With this
setting, LVM autoactivation will not activate these LVs, and the
storage stack will take care of activating/deactivating the LV on the
correct node when needed.

This additionally fixes an issue with multipath on FC/SAS-attached
LUNs where LVs would be activated too early after boot when multipath
is not yet available, see [3] for more details and current workaround.

The `--setautoactivation` flag was introduced with LVM 2.03.12 [2],
Bookworm/PVE 8 ships 2.03.16.

Note that the flag is only set for newly created LVs, so LVs created
before this patch can still trigger #4997. To avoid this, users can
manually disable autoactivation for existing LVs or for the entire VG,
in case the VG contains no LVs that users want to autoactivate.

[1] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4997
[2] https://gitlab.com/lvmteam/lvm2/-/blob/main/WHATS_NEW
[3] https://pve.proxmox.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Multipath&oldid=12039#FC/SAS-specific_configuration

Signed-off-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
---

Notes:
    new in v2
    
    probably need to wait until PVE 9 for applying this, see cover letter

 src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
index bb54c71..43d7df8 100644
--- a/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/Storage/LVMPlugin.pm
@@ -351,6 +351,7 @@ sub lvcreate {
 	'--yes',
 	'--size', $size,
 	'--name', $name,
+	'--setautoactivation', 'n',
     ];
     for my $tag (@$tags) {
 	push @$cmd, '--addtag', $tag;
-- 
2.39.5



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel