From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9191FF173 for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:37:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A5B5119BC; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:37:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1740400658; x=1741005458; d=canarybit.eu; s=rsa2; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from; bh=pU+zlcUJlzTcn+ACZqjZwD0zCYYkW8opxhYrAWZB3XM=; b=M3mSi55AQc4aGKSPrIOG00edJobnHV+duGxCrCI+pzhb504WsjoJZhEXhk7Moz/f69tih7M8AnzQU 7XNi3MzNxRJ8AsVADNbt+8wUa81AMCs4CKc7fezU+ku2Wzq9NOO+cjgBOsteyS4jlqxJCGa1iToEFb uRu/8zja2/lp9K4YdV4luSQ2/T9gYLfD/t31tobPy/9+1DPfbFzyF18aZPOqjKNFkw4EMK3XpO73q3 14KpG5985BcvlwXyWYjuqwI6ql1QylogMCItJCjE0NL/Va27TK4V7S/lkTPP+gOaTxVCtXTtY56saw 2BoaWQnCG33DQ0iOGvmryvIg3d31soQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1740400658; x=1741005458; d=canarybit.eu; s=ed2; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from; bh=pU+zlcUJlzTcn+ACZqjZwD0zCYYkW8opxhYrAWZB3XM=; b=HQOWWotMsO0/OZKT7d9qGR275DmjpQ780JxAwMghbxfpZuE+yC53+8OSAOFXEngnyt8cyI9YL4qso lRDjFo6CQ== X-HalOne-ID: 187cf90f-f2ac-11ef-ab26-29b2d794c87d From: Philipp Giersfeld <philipp.giersfeld@canarybit.eu> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 13:37:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20250224123714.2662460-1-philipp.giersfeld@canarybit.eu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.208 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_PASS -0.001 SPF: HELO matches SPF record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH edk2-firmware/qemu-server/manager v3 0/5] AMD SEV-SNP X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com> This patch series adds support for AMD SEV-SNP. Where possible it mimics the existing support for AMD SEV(-ES). Running SEV-SNP VMs requires a more recent version of edk2 and OVMF firmware image. Contrary to other setups, SEV-SNP does not support loading the firmware via pflash. Instead, the firmware image is loaded via the -bios option. --- changes since v2: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2025-February/068418.html * Only set no-key-sharing if SNP is not used * Fix formatting _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel