From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B70931FF15C
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:03:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0E83FE510;
Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:03:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:03:09 +0100
Message-Id: <20250205150309.186958-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.241 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery
methods
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
Validity was blocked. See
https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more
information.
RDNS_NONE 0.793 Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH patches 1/1] fix #6142: ui: dc options: allow
custom CIDRs for migration network
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Sometimes the desired migration network is not configured on any
network interfaces on the node. For instance, if there is a full-mesh
network the CIDR for the router IPs is not configured on any network
interface, but still a valid choice as migration network. This patch
fixes this by allowing users to additionally enter arbitrary CIDRs
into the field setting the migration network.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
---
www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js
index b200fd12d..bd54d7618 100644
--- a/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js
+++ b/www/manager6/dc/OptionView.js
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ Ext.define('PVE.dc.OptionView', {
emptyText: Proxmox.Utils.defaultText,
autoSelect: false,
skipEmptyText: true,
+ editable: true,
+ notFoundIsValid: true,
+ vtype: 'IP64CIDRAddress',
}],
});
me.add_inputpanel_row('ha', gettext('HA Settings'), {
--
2.39.5
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel