From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9])
	by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026F71FF16E
	for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Mon,  3 Feb 2025 12:15:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 83FF22DBCD;
	Mon,  3 Feb 2025 12:15:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Alexander Abraham <a.abraham@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon,  3 Feb 2025 12:14:48 +0100
Message-Id: <20250203111448.80291-3-a.abraham@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5
In-Reply-To: <20250203111448.80291-1-a.abraham@proxmox.com>
References: <20250203111448.80291-1-a.abraham@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.125 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_SBL_A 0.1 Contains URL's A record listed in the Spamhaus SBL blocklist
 [185.199.108.153, 185.199.111.153, 185.199.110.153]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-docs v2 2/2] PVE docs: Made small edits.
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: Alexander Abraham <a.abraham@proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>

A long sentence in the section about Swap on ZFS was split
into two sentences and some typos were corrected.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Abraham <a.abraham@proxmox.com>
---
 local-zfs.adoc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/local-zfs.adoc b/local-zfs.adoc
index bcd02f7..b662233 100644
--- a/local-zfs.adoc
+++ b/local-zfs.adoc
@@ -627,7 +627,8 @@ You *must reboot* to activate these changes.
 SWAP on ZFS
 ~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-It is strongly recommended to not use a ZFS volume for a swap partition because this could lead to deadlocks freezing thge affected system and other unpredictable behavior. The OpenZFS documentation, which can be viewed https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/Project%20and%20Community/FAQ.html#using-a-zvol-for-a-swap-device-on-linux[here], warns against using a ZFS volume for a swap partition.
+It is strongly recommended to not use a ZFS volume for a swap partition because this could lead to deadlocks. These deadlocks could cause the affected system to freeze. 
+The OpenZFS documentation, which can be viewed https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/Project%20and%20Community/FAQ.html#using-a-zvol-for-a-swap-device-on-linux[here], warns about using a ZFS volume for a swap partition.
 
 [[zfs_encryption]]
 Encrypted ZFS Datasets
-- 
2.39.5



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel