From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA151FF164 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:55:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2BE057520; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:55:48 +0100 (CET) From: Aaron Lauterer To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:55:08 +0100 Message-Id: <20241206135514.170226-2-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20241206135514.170226-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20241206135514.170226-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.035 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/7] ui: ceph pool: add columns for application X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Since we already have the information from the API call, why not add it as a (hidden) column. It can be useful to quickly see which ceph applications are enabled for a pool in some situations. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer --- as mentioned in the cover letter, this patch has nothing directly to do with the series, but since I rely on the application info of the pool to enable/disable the namespace grid, why not make it possible to see that info of the pools as well in the pool grid if wanted. www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js b/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js index 16479fee..9346c939 100644 --- a/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js +++ b/www/manager6/ceph/Pool.js @@ -307,6 +307,14 @@ Ext.define('PVE.node.Ceph.PoolList', { dataIndex: 'type', hidden: true, }, + { + text: gettext('Application'), + minWidth: 100, + flex: 1, + dataIndex: 'application_metadata', + hidden: true, + renderer: (v, _meta, _rec) => Object.keys(v).toString(), + }, { text: gettext('Size') + '/min', minWidth: 100, -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel