From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 313331FF16F for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:30:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EBC9318AD9; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:30:02 +0100 (CET) From: Shannon Sterz To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:29:18 +0100 Message-Id: <20241115152918.253633-1-s.sterz@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.043 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit] dark theme: make icons in the permissions tree in pve dark X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" these icons are multiply style because they seem to be handled differently across products. so this in essence "double inverts" them in the context where that is needed Signed-off-by: Shannon Sterz --- src/proxmox-dark/scss/other/_icons.scss | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/proxmox-dark/scss/other/_icons.scss b/src/proxmox-dark/scss/other/_icons.scss index c045cf4..ad08906 100644 --- a/src/proxmox-dark/scss/other/_icons.scss +++ b/src/proxmox-dark/scss/other/_icons.scss @@ -33,6 +33,13 @@ color: $icon-color; } +// pve needs to set `color` on this pseudo element, but the api viewer and pbs +// add a filter to the parent. so invert it here again, to fix this for pve. +.x-tree-icon-parent:not(.x-tree-icon-custom)::before, +.x-tree-icon-parent-expanded:not(.x-tree-icon-custom)::before { + filter: invert(90%); +} + // but some are implement as background SVGs or PNGs. invert them via // filters: .fa-ceph::before, -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel