From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141F31FF168 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:58:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7FC191A874; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:58:52 +0100 (CET) From: Daniel Herzig To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:58:03 +0100 Message-Id: <20241028155803.22900-1-d.herzig@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.010 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH container] fix #5742: lxc: setup: centos template keep static ipv6 assignment X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Andres Moya Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" As reported here [0], statically assigned IPv6 addresses get lost after a short while for Rocky and Almalinux 9 containers. As pointed out by Andres, the additional option `IPV6_AUTOCONF=no` for the corresponding network interface seems to prevent the configured IPv6 address to be dropped. [0] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5745 Reported-by: Andres Moya Signed-off-by: Daniel Herzig --- src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm b/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm index 2ad1f0c..fddcffa 100644 --- a/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm +++ b/src/PVE/LXC/Setup/CentOS.pm @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ sub setup_network { } elsif ($d->{ip6} eq 'dhcp') { $data .= "DHCPV6C=yes\n"; } else { - $data .= "IPV6ADDR=$d->{ip6}\n"; + $data .= "IPV6ADDR=$d->{ip6}\nIPV6_AUTOCONF=no\n"; if (defined($d->{gw6})) { if (!PVE::Network::is_ip_in_cidr($d->{gw6}, $d->{ip6}, 6) && !PVE::Network::is_ip_in_cidr($d->{gw6}, 'fe80::/10', 6) -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel