From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D7101FF166 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:13:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 136D71E5C2; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:13:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Friedrich Weber To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:13:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20241025111304.99680-3-f.weber@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20241025111304.99680-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> References: <20241025111304.99680-1-f.weber@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.025 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 2/2] storage: rbd: document KRBD map options property X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Describe the new `krbd-map-options` property, and mention under which circumstances the `rxbounce` option may be necessary. Signed-off-by: Friedrich Weber --- pve-storage-rbd.adoc | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/pve-storage-rbd.adoc b/pve-storage-rbd.adoc index 5fe558a..71fbc02 100644 --- a/pve-storage-rbd.adoc +++ b/pve-storage-rbd.adoc @@ -56,6 +56,16 @@ Enforce access to rados block devices through the krbd kernel module. Optional. NOTE: Containers will use `krbd` independent of the option value. +krbd-map-options:: + +Comma-separated list of additional map options for KRBD, see the Ceph docs. +footnote:[Kernel RBD (KRBD) options +{cephdocs-url}/man/8/rbd/#kernel-rbd-krbd-options] Optional. ++ +Currently, only the `rxbounce` option is supported. In case the pool hosts +Windows VM disks, setting `rxbounce` can be necessary to avoid performance +degradation and `bad crc/signature` warnings in the host journal. + .Configuration Example for a external Ceph cluster (`/etc/pve/storage.cfg`) ---- rbd: ceph-external -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel