From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DB21FF15C for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:11:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CE83BF5FC; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:12:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Aaron Lauterer To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:11:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20241002131157.227292-6-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <20241002131157.227292-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> References: <20241002131157.227292-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.039 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit v5 5/7] Network: add explanation for bridge vids field X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" Make clear that it affects only out-/inbound traffic and can be used if the underlying physical NICs support only a limited number of VLANs when offloading is possible. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer Reviewed-by: Shannon Sterz --- changes since v4: none v3-follow-up: * reordered inside the patch series * reworded explanation according to suggestion src/node/NetworkEdit.js | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/node/NetworkEdit.js b/src/node/NetworkEdit.js index bfd0268..2e8dc25 100644 --- a/src/node/NetworkEdit.js +++ b/src/node/NetworkEdit.js @@ -112,6 +112,12 @@ Ext.define('Proxmox.node.NetworkEdit', { return true; }, }); + let vidsExplanation = Ext.create('Ext.form.field.Display', { + disabled: true, + userCls: 'pmx-hint', + value: 'Limits the number of VLANs forwarded by the bridge ports. Useful if ' + + 'the physical NICs only support a limited number of offloaded VLANs.', + }); column2.push({ xtype: 'proxmoxcheckbox', fieldLabel: gettext('VLAN aware'), @@ -121,6 +127,7 @@ Ext.define('Proxmox.node.NetworkEdit', { change: function(f, newVal) { if (me.bridge_set_vids) { vids.setDisabled(!newVal); + vidsExplanation.setDisabled(!newVal); } }, }, @@ -136,6 +143,7 @@ Ext.define('Proxmox.node.NetworkEdit', { }); if (me.bridge_set_vids) { advancedColumn2.push(vids); + advancedColumn2.push(vidsExplanation); } } else if (me.iftype === 'OVSBridge') { column2.push({ -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel