From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [IPv6:2a01:7e0:0:424::9]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88461FF15F for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:33:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 675A31ADB7; Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:34:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Csapak To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 12:33:31 +0200 Message-Id: <20240923103331.1508338-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.016 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to Validity was blocked. See https://knowledge.validity.com/hc/en-us/articles/20961730681243 for more information. SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager] fix #5734: provide missing methods for Proxmox.Utils for mobile ui X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" since the mobile ui shares the Utils code with the desktop web ui, (but not the proxmox-widget-toolkit) all methods used in constructors, etc. there must be available in the mobile ui too. We don't have any notification configuration options in the mobile ui, and AFAIK we don't plan to add those there, so we can just implement stub functions. This way the Utils constructor can proceed without errors, fixing loading the mobile ui. Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak --- www/mobile/WidgetToolkitUtils.js | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/www/mobile/WidgetToolkitUtils.js b/www/mobile/WidgetToolkitUtils.js index b292fcd5..ea710faf 100644 --- a/www/mobile/WidgetToolkitUtils.js +++ b/www/mobile/WidgetToolkitUtils.js @@ -586,6 +586,15 @@ utilities: { } }, + overrideNotificationFieldName: function(extra) { + // do nothing, we don't have notification configuration in mobile ui + }, + + overrideNotificationFieldValue: function(extra) { + // do nothing, we don't have notification configuration in mobile ui + }, + + format_task_description: function(type, id) { let farray = Proxmox.Utils.task_desc_table[type]; let text; -- 2.39.5 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel