From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE571FF391
for <inbox@lore.proxmox.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:03:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4336413D72;
Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:03:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:03:16 +0200
Message-Id: <20240627110317.23787-3-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2
In-Reply-To: <20240627110317.23787-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
References: <20240627110317.23787-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.063 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 2/3] drive: tpm: fix default version
in schema
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com
Sender: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Since the check in start_swtpm() only checks for an explicitly
configured v2.0 to opt-in to version 2, the actual default is v1.2
and not v2.0 like the schema stated.
Of course, it would be nicer to have the default be v2.0, but changing
the check to use that default would break any TPM state without an
explicitly configured version.
There doesn't seem to be any code beside start_swtpm() accessing the
version.
Fixes: f9dde219 ("fix #3075: add TPM v1.2 and v2.0 support via swtpm")
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm b/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm
index 6a4fafd9..6e98c095 100644
--- a/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm
+++ b/PVE/QemuServer/Drive.pm
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ my %tpmversion_fmt = (
description => "The TPM interface version. v2.0 is newer and should be preferred."
." Note that this cannot be changed later on.",
optional => 1,
- default => 'v2.0',
+ default => 'v1.2',
},
);
my $tpmstate_fmt = {
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel