From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) by lore.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE681FF390 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:00:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C300B1D3F7; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 13:01:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quantumachine.net; q=dns/txt; s=k1; t=1715610698; x=1715617898; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version: Message-ID: Date: Subject: Subject: Cc: To: To: From: From: Sender: Sender; bh=xOselPE3Vb4VdxusUbMTfM4Kk7QjQ9XAZlRDUll/rE0=; b=vgC88DIFPDU5c4pfm03JabOQsjD0AXTmLXp8u2rgaPlxGkOcLAUYMauWxH1XPb1fBHjwFRpE5pjuNQHR6567heS4US1U3763cHxJ5Q36oBc78KFf0im0sSDkvG60Pd/wy4GOwXuhgNpHFDkrZRsrkXUN5Tooc9OtKMGZMPq+t6X7NaqEFiuNdZ8NP+i4iDeQAeM7jD7dyMx6LF949iUHxm11nDBWUysVIhPFYLnCRCpbPA71rilM/WyWqQgz+banDEfrhXFnD4WM9o/2b8icHDrFczt6lQQ2zffl6N9SwUaqxtRu8QSMowkqb03Zbo5NFIY6lN0k3IJWdrcAeFph7w== X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 185.250.239.4 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJhNzgzYiIsInB2ZS1kZXZlbEBsaXN0cy5wcm94bW94LmNvbSIsIjBiNTciXQ== From: Antonio Huete Jimenez To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 16:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20240513142128.234017-1-tuxillo@quantumachine.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_INVALID 0.1 DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 -0.001 Average reputation (+2) SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 13:01:21 +0200 Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH lxcfs 0/1] d/rules: Allow passing options to the lxcfs systemd unit X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Proxmox VE development discussion Cc: Antonio Huete Jimenez Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com Sender: "pve-devel" As specified in https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/45724, the load average emulation is not being taken into consideration for the lxcfs systemd unit. Thus, people tend to edit the unit file itself which is then lost on every upgrade. This change allows passing lxcfs opts to lxcfs but the default behavior is still preferred. Antonio Huete Jimenez (1): d/rules: Allow passing options to the lxcfs systemd unit debian/changelog | 6 ++++++ debian/lxcfs.default | 4 ++++ debian/patches/allow-passing-opts.patch | 16 ++++++++++++++++ debian/patches/series | 1 + debian/rules | 3 +++ 5 files changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 debian/lxcfs.default create mode 100644 debian/patches/allow-passing-opts.patch -- 2.42.0 _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel