From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A77F696C82
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:21:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4EB8F1A884
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:21:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 85C43428F2
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:20:53 +0200
Message-Id: <20240416122054.733817-19-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2
In-Reply-To: <20240416122054.733817-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
References: <20240416122054.733817-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.055 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 qemu-server 5/6] start: handle pool limits
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:21:15 -0000

if the start is not part of an incoming migration, check the VM against its
pool's run limit.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
---
 PVE/QemuServer.pm | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
index be937ec1..78b6ff96 100644
--- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
+++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
@@ -5704,6 +5704,19 @@ sub vm_start_nolock {
 	    # But we do it above, so for now let's be consistent.
 	    $conf = PVE::QemuConfig->load_config($vmid); # update/reload
 	}
+
+	my $cpu_count = 1;
+	$cpu_count = $conf->{sockets} if $conf->{sockets};
+	$cpu_count *= ($conf->{cores} || 1);
+	$cpu_count = $conf->{vcpus} if $conf->{vcpus} && $conf->{vcpus} < $cpu_count;
+
+	my $changes = {
+	    absolute => 1,
+	    running => 1,
+	    mem => get_current_memory($conf->{memory}),
+	    cpu => $cpu_count,
+	};
+	PVE::GuestHelpers::check_guest_pool_limit($vmid, $changes);
     }
 
     # override offline migrated volumes, conf is out of date still
-- 
2.39.2