From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24F3494D98 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:46:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F17001EA06 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:45:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:45:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2007A449E4 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:45:38 +0200 (CEST) From: =?UTF-8?q?Fabian=20Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:45:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20240411094536.150914-1-f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.057 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH] d/postinst: don't treat reload/restart failure as fatal X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:46:09 -0000 aborting apt invocations because of service failures like that is always painful, and lxcfs is in a lot of our build-dep chains, and build environments might not run systemd as init. Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler --- debian/lxcfs.postinst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/lxcfs.postinst b/debian/lxcfs.postinst index 558a0d0..ae1b7a2 100644 --- a/debian/lxcfs.postinst +++ b/debian/lxcfs.postinst @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ case "$1" in unit=lxcfs.service if systemctl -q is-enabled "$unit"; then systemctl --system daemon-reload >/dev/null || true - deb-systemd-invoke $dh_action "$unit" + deb-systemd-invoke $dh_action "$unit" || true fi ;; -- 2.39.2