From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22AA794CDA for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:33:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3BBDC1DFE6 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0B9DA44A4F for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:33:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:29:33 +0200 Message-Id: <20240411092943.57377-13-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240411092943.57377-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20240411092943.57377-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.072 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 12/22] vzdump: have property string helpers always return the result X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:33:51 -0000 Previously, the result would only be returned implicitly and if not already parsed. While callers do not strictly need the return value, future callers might mistakenly rely on it and even work by chance in some scenarios, because of the implicit return. Make the code more future proof by explicitly returning the result in all cases. Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner --- New in v3. PVE/VZDump.pm | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/PVE/VZDump.pm b/PVE/VZDump.pm index 152eb3e5..72461f73 100644 --- a/PVE/VZDump.pm +++ b/PVE/VZDump.pm @@ -134,9 +134,11 @@ my sub parse_performance { my ($param) = @_; if (defined(my $perf = $param->{performance})) { - return if ref($perf) eq 'HASH'; # already parsed + return $perf if ref($perf) eq 'HASH'; # already parsed $param->{performance} = PVE::JSONSchema::parse_property_string('backup-performance', $perf); } + + return $param->{performance}; } my $parse_prune_backups_maxfiles = sub { @@ -149,7 +151,7 @@ my $parse_prune_backups_maxfiles = sub { if defined($maxfiles) && defined($prune_backups); if (defined($prune_backups)) { - return if ref($prune_backups) eq 'HASH'; # already parsed + return $prune_backups if ref($prune_backups) eq 'HASH'; # already parsed $param->{'prune-backups'} = PVE::JSONSchema::parse_property_string( 'prune-backups', $prune_backups @@ -161,6 +163,8 @@ my $parse_prune_backups_maxfiles = sub { $param->{'prune-backups'} = { 'keep-all' => 1 }; } } + + return $param->{'prune-backups'}; }; sub storage_info { -- 2.39.2