From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1685941B0 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD193CB0D for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBF7143C6C for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Csapak To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:03:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20240410110401.2226201-9-d.csapak@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240410110401.2226201-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> References: <20240410110401.2226201-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2 03/10] pci: mapping: check mdev config against hardware X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:04:34 -0000 by giving the mapping config to assert_valid, not only the specific mapping Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak --- PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm b/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm index 7ff9cad7..6ba43ee8 100644 --- a/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm +++ b/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm @@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ sub parse_hostpci { die "PCI device mapping not found for '$mapping'\n" if !$devices || !scalar($devices->@*); for my $device ($devices->@*) { - eval { PVE::Mapping::PCI::assert_valid($mapping, $device) }; + eval { PVE::Mapping::PCI::assert_valid($mapping, $device, $config->{ids}->{$mapping}) }; die "PCI device mapping invalid (hardware probably changed): $@\n" if $@; push $alternatives->@*, [split(/;/, $device->{path})]; } -- 2.39.2