From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1685941B0
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AD193CB0D
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DBF7143C6C
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:04:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:03:47 +0200
Message-Id: <20240410110401.2226201-9-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2
In-Reply-To: <20240410110401.2226201-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
References: <20240410110401.2226201-1-d.csapak@proxmox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.014 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2 03/10] pci: mapping: check mdev
config against hardware
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:04:34 -0000
by giving the mapping config to assert_valid, not only the specific mapping
Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
---
PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm b/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm
index 7ff9cad7..6ba43ee8 100644
--- a/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm
+++ b/PVE/QemuServer/PCI.pm
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ sub parse_hostpci {
die "PCI device mapping not found for '$mapping'\n" if !$devices || !scalar($devices->@*);
for my $device ($devices->@*) {
- eval { PVE::Mapping::PCI::assert_valid($mapping, $device) };
+ eval { PVE::Mapping::PCI::assert_valid($mapping, $device, $config->{ids}->{$mapping}) };
die "PCI device mapping invalid (hardware probably changed): $@\n" if $@;
push $alternatives->@*, [split(/;/, $device->{path})];
}
--
2.39.2