From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A560DBA90D for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:14:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 843FC1006D for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:14:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:14:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4594048B20 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:14:20 +0100 (CET) From: Aaron Lauterer To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:14:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20240320131419.180987-1-a.lauterer@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.060 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v2] system-requirements: mention that SSDs with PLP should be used X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:14:51 -0000 Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer --- Thanks for the feedback. I think this variant transports the important infomation in simple english. pve-system-requirements.adoc | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pve-system-requirements.adoc b/pve-system-requirements.adoc index bc3689d..98279bb 100644 --- a/pve-system-requirements.adoc +++ b/pve-system-requirements.adoc @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ Recommended System Requirements (BBU) or non-RAID for ZFS and Ceph. Neither ZFS nor Ceph are compatible with a hardware RAID controller. ** Shared and distributed storage is possible. - +** Enterprise grade SSDs are recommended for good performance. Check for power + loss protection (PLP) to avoid using consumer-grade SSDs, which are not + recommended. * Redundant (Multi-)Gbit NICs, with additional NICs depending on the preferred storage technology and cluster setup. -- 2.39.2