From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0AD9B970F for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:19:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BB6E7A54F for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:19:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:19:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 10C9746FC9 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:19:38 +0100 (CET) From: Max Carrara To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:19:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20240314101930.198214-1-m.carrara@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -1.484 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - URIBL_BLACK 3 Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [mon.pm] Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-manager 1/2] fix #5198: ceph: mon: fix mon existence check in mon removal assertion X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:19:39 -0000 The Ceph monitor removal assertion contains a condition that checks whether the given mon ID actually exists and thus may be removed. The first part of the condition checks whether the hash returned by `get_services_info` [0] contains the key "mon.$monid". However, the hash's keys are never prefixed with "mon.", which makes this check incorrect. This is fixed by just using "$monid" directly. The second part checks whether the mon hashes returned by Ceph contain the "name" key before comparing the key with the given mon ID. This key existence check is also incorrect; in particular: * If the lookup `$_->{name}` evaluates to e.g. "foo", the check passes, because "foo" is truthy. [1] * If the lookup `$_->{name}` evaluates to "0", the check fails, because "0" is falsy (due to it being equivalent to the number 0, according to Perl [1]). This is solved by using the inbuilt `defined()` instead of relying on Perl's definition of truthiness. [0]: https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-manager.git;a=blob;f=PVE/Ceph/Services.pm;h=e0f31e8eb6bc9b3777b3d0d548497276efaa5c41;hb=HEAD#l112 [1]: https://perldoc.perl.org/perldata#Scalar-values Fixes: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5198 Signed-off-by: Max Carrara --- PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm b/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm index 1e959ef3..057ca70d 100644 --- a/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm +++ b/PVE/API2/Ceph/MON.pm @@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ my $assert_mon_prerequisites = sub { my $assert_mon_can_remove = sub { my ($monhash, $monlist, $monid, $mondir) = @_; - if (!(defined($monhash->{"mon.$monid"}) || - grep { $_->{name} && $_->{name} eq $monid } @$monlist)) + if (!(defined($monhash->{$monid}) || + grep { defined($_->{name}) && $_->{name} eq $monid } @$monlist)) { die "no such monitor id '$monid'\n" } -- 2.39.2