From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8864E94EBC for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:37:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 69CE01A787 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:36:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from lana.proxmox.com (unknown [94.136.29.99]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:36:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by lana.proxmox.com (Postfix, from userid 10043) id 2AEA32C1A00; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:36:52 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Hanreich To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:36:48 +0100 Message-Id: <20240223143651.418065-4-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240223143651.418065-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> References: <20240223143651.418065-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 1 AWL -2.060 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS 3.335 Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS RDNS_NONE 0.793 Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 widget-toolkit 3/6] network: allow bridges to have any valid interface name X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:37:23 -0000 Allow the web UI to accept bridge interfaces with any valid interface name, rather than being limited to the arbitrary "vmbr" prefix. Originally-by: Jillian Morgan Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich --- src/Toolkit.js | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/Toolkit.js b/src/Toolkit.js index 6fd73f5..b8fbd91 100644 --- a/src/Toolkit.js +++ b/src/Toolkit.js @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ Ext.apply(Ext.form.field.VTypes, { MacPrefixText: gettext('Example') + ': 02:8f - ' + gettext('only unicast addresses are allowed'), BridgeName: function(v) { - return (/^vmbr\d{1,4}$/).test(v); + return (/^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]{0,14}$/).test(v); }, VlanName: function(v) { if (Proxmox.Utils.VlanInterface_match.test(v)) { @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Ext.apply(Ext.form.field.VTypes, { } return true; }, - BridgeNameText: gettext('Format') + ': vmbrN, where 0 <= N <= 9999', + BridgeNameText: gettext('Format') + ': alphanumeric string starting with a character', BondName: function(v) { return (/^bond\d{1,4}$/).test(v); -- 2.39.2