From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C273390EF5 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:37:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B79E348BA for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:37:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:37:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5F63F47C06 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:37:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:37:24 +0100 From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com> To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> Message-ID: <20240213113724.04c2d5ec@rosa.proxmox.com> In-Reply-To: <367058e2-28f4-40bc-88e3-2e3d4f898d59@proxmox.com> References: <20230710134951.79263-1-n.ullreich@proxmox.com> <20230710134951.79263-3-n.ullreich@proxmox.com> <Za6szkChsWDcKwDv@rosa.proxmox.com> <367058e2-28f4-40bc-88e3-2e3d4f898d59@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.087 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: Re: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH pmg_docs 1/1] Consistency of GB and GiB pmg X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:37:56 -0000 Thanks for the catch! pushed a fix-up On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 13:20:51 +0100 Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> wrote: > Am 22/01/2024 um 18:58 schrieb Stoiko Ivanov: > > applied this one to pmg-docs - huge thanks! > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 03:49:49PM +0200, Noel Ullreich wrote: > >> Since the actual system-checks are done in GiB and to stay consistent > >> with the other docs, change all GB units to GiB > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Noel Ullreich <n.ullreich@proxmox.com> > >> --- > >> pmg-planning-deployment.adoc | 8 ++++---- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc b/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc > >> index 9287574..6a0083b 100644 > >> --- a/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc > >> +++ b/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc > >> @@ -110,13 +110,13 @@ Minimum System Requirements > >> > >> * CPU: 64bit (Intel EMT64 or AMD64) > >> > >> -* 2 GB RAM > >> +* 2 GiB RAM > >> > >> * Bootable CD-ROM-drive or USB boot support > >> > >> * Monitor with a minimum resolution of 1024x768 for the installation > >> > >> -* Hard disk with at least 8 GB of disk space > >> +* Hard disk with at least 8 GiB of disk space > > this is using the wrong unit though, we use the SI based GB for > disk space, as most storage vendors do, GiB is fine for memory though. > > >> > >> * Ethernet network interface card (NIC) > >> > >> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ Recommended System Requirements > >> * Multi-core CPU: 64bit (Intel EMT64 or AMD64), + > >> ** for use in a virtual machine, activate Intel VT/AMD-V CPU flag > >> > >> -* 4 GB RAM > >> +* 4 GiB RAM > >> > >> * Bootable CD-ROM-drive or USB boot support > >> > >> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ Recommended System Requirements > >> > >> * 1 Gbps Ethernet network interface card (NIC) > >> > >> -* Storage: at least 8 GB free disk space, best set up with redundancy, > >> +* Storage: at least 8 GiB free disk space, best set up with redundancy, > > same here > > >> using a hardware RAID controller with battery backed write cache (``BBU'') or > >> ZFS. ZFS is not compatible with hardware RAID controllers. For best > >> performance, use enterprise-class SSDs with power loss protection. > >> -- > >> 2.39.2