From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1592593510
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  5 Feb 2024 13:29:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E2120166CA
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  5 Feb 2024 13:28:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  5 Feb 2024 13:28:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9B20444342
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon,  5 Feb 2024 13:28:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Mon,  5 Feb 2024 13:28:53 +0100
Message-Id: <20240205122854.83495-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL -0.072 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DMARC_MISSING             0.1 Missing DMARC policy
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH common 1/2] REST environment: warn helpers: use
 warn instead of printing to stderr
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:29:29 -0000

Like this, __WARN__ handlers will still be called. In particular,
daemons like pvestatd will set a __WARN__ handler and also log
warnings to syslog. The intention behind introducing log_warn() was to
make warnings more visible, not less, so fix the semantics to make
sure switching from warn to log_warn() does not have this unintended
side-effect.

Reported-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
 src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm b/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm
index 191c6eb..41efb16 100644
--- a/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/RESTEnvironment.pm
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ sub log_warn {
 	$rest_env->warn($message);
     } else {
 	chomp($message);
-	print STDERR "WARN: $message\n";
+	warn "WARN: $message\n";
     }
 }
 
@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ sub warn {
 
     chomp($message);
 
-    print STDERR "WARN: $message\n";
+    warn "WARN: $message\n";
 
     $self->{warning_count}++;
 }
-- 
2.39.2