From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 662FD90D57 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:41:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 47AD81B9AD for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:41:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:41:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A31E6492BA for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:41:53 +0100 (CET) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:41:39 +0100 Message-Id: <20240125144149.216064-4-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240125144149.216064-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> References: <20240125144149.216064-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.075 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu 03/13] block/io: clear BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE flag after recursing in bdrv_co_block_status X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:41:55 -0000 Using fleecing backup like in [0] on a qcow2 image (with metadata preallocation) can lead to the following assertion failure: > bdrv_co_do_block_status: Assertion `!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO)' failed. In the reproducer [0], it happens because the BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE flag will be set by the qcow2 driver, so the caller will recursively check the file child. Then the BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO set too. Later up the call chain, in bdrv_co_do_block_status() for the snapshot-access driver, the assertion failure will happen, because both flags are set. To fix it, clear the recurse flag after the recursive check was done. In detail: > #0 qcow2_co_block_status Returns 0x45 = BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID. > #1 bdrv_co_do_block_status Because of the data flag, bdrv_co_do_block_status() will now also set BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED. Because of the recurse flag, bdrv_co_do_block_status() for the bdrv_file child will be called, which returns 0x16 = BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO. Now the return value inherits the zero flag. Returns 0x57 = BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE | BDRV_BLOCK_DATA | BDRV_BLOCK_OFFSET_VALID | BDRV_BLOCK_ALLOCATED | BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO. > #2 bdrv_co_common_block_status_above > #3 bdrv_co_block_status_above > #4 bdrv_co_block_status > #5 cbw_co_snapshot_block_status > #6 bdrv_co_snapshot_block_status > #7 snapshot_access_co_block_status > #8 bdrv_co_do_block_status Return value is propagated all the way up to here, where the assertion failure happens, because BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE and BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO are both set. > #9 bdrv_co_common_block_status_above > #10 bdrv_co_block_status_above > #11 block_copy_block_status > #12 block_copy_dirty_clusters > #13 block_copy_common > #14 block_copy_async_co_entry > #15 coroutine_trampoline [0]: > #!/bin/bash > rm /tmp/disk.qcow2 > ./qemu-img create /tmp/disk.qcow2 -o preallocation=metadata -f qcow2 1G > ./qemu-img create /tmp/fleecing.qcow2 -f qcow2 1G > ./qemu-img create /tmp/backup.qcow2 -f qcow2 1G > ./qemu-system-x86_64 --qmp stdio \ > --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node0,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/disk.qcow2 \ > --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node1,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/fleecing.qcow2 \ > --blockdev qcow2,node-name=node2,file.driver=file,file.filename=/tmp/backup.qcow2 \ > < {"execute": "qmp_capabilities"} > {"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "copy-before-write", "file": "node0", "target": "node1", "node-name": "node3" } } > {"execute": "blockdev-add", "arguments": { "driver": "snapshot-access", "file": "node3", "node-name": "snap0" } } > {"execute": "blockdev-backup", "arguments": { "device": "snap0", "target": "node1", "sync": "full", "job-id": "backup0" } } > EOF Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy --- Can be added as an extra/ patch. block/io.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index 63f7b3ad3e..24a3c84c93 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -2589,6 +2589,16 @@ bdrv_co_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs, bool want_zero, ret |= (ret2 & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO); } } + + /* + * Now that the recursive search was done, clear the flag. Otherwise, + * with more complicated block graphs like snapshot-access -> + * copy-before-write -> qcow2, where the return value will be propagated + * further up to a parent bdrv_co_do_block_status() call, both the + * BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE and BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO flags would be set, which is + * not allowed. + */ + ret &= ~BDRV_BLOCK_RECURSE; } out: -- 2.39.2