From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89287BFE40 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:50:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5A1F519DF2 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:50:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from bastionodiso.odiso.net (bastionodiso.odiso.net [IPv6:2a0a:1580:2000::2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:50:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from kvmformation3.odiso.net (formationkvm3.odiso.net [10.3.94.12]) by bastionodiso.odiso.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6478172; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:50:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by kvmformation3.odiso.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 1197985015; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:50:31 +0100 (CET) From: Alexandre Derumier To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 15:50:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20240109145030.1647121-1-aderumier@odiso.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.024 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS 0.248 From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY 1 Sending domain does not have any anti-forgery methods SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_NONE 0.001 SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH ceph 0/2] Build rocksdb in non-debug mode X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 14:50:39 -0000 They are a bug in current debian packaging, where rocksdb is build in debug mode (not inheriting from cmake flags) patch 1 already exist in ubuntu patch 2 is a newer patch commited in ceph recently (patch 2 should be enough, but I'm keeping patch1 by security). I have tested it, 4k randwrite iops x2, fio: 4k randwrite:queue depth=64:sync write: cache=none: before: 16000 iops https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDKu9dqXYAAeH4I?format=jpg&name=large after: 38000 iops https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDKu9dqW8AA3dE8?format=jpg&name=large sandre-win.altima-hosting.fr sandre-win.altima-hosting.fr and submit latency /3 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GDFmBJOW8AApWYZ?format=jpg&name=large Alexandre Derumier (2): patch: debian/rules: fix build type patch: add 0022-rocksb-inherit-parent-cmake-cxx-flags.patch patches/0021-debian-rules-fix-buildtype.patch | 22 +++++++ ...ocksb-inherit-parent-cmake-cxx-flags.patch | 57 +++++++++++++++++++ patches/series | 2 + 3 files changed, 81 insertions(+) create mode 100644 patches/0021-debian-rules-fix-buildtype.patch create mode 100644 patches/0022-rocksb-inherit-parent-cmake-cxx-flags.patch -- 2.39.2