From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <n.ullreich@proxmox.com> Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26CA0CC02 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:50:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0A39718652 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:50:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:50:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2C7144294F for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:50:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Noel Ullreich <n.ullreich@proxmox.com> To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:49:49 +0200 Message-Id: <20230710134951.79263-3-n.ullreich@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230710134951.79263-1-n.ullreich@proxmox.com> References: <20230710134951.79263-1-n.ullreich@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL 0.061 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH pmg_docs 1/1] Consistency of GB and GiB pmg X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:50:05 -0000 Since the actual system-checks are done in GiB and to stay consistent with the other docs, change all GB units to GiB Signed-off-by: Noel Ullreich <n.ullreich@proxmox.com> --- pmg-planning-deployment.adoc | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc b/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc index 9287574..6a0083b 100644 --- a/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc +++ b/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc @@ -110,13 +110,13 @@ Minimum System Requirements * CPU: 64bit (Intel EMT64 or AMD64) -* 2 GB RAM +* 2 GiB RAM * Bootable CD-ROM-drive or USB boot support * Monitor with a minimum resolution of 1024x768 for the installation -* Hard disk with at least 8 GB of disk space +* Hard disk with at least 8 GiB of disk space * Ethernet network interface card (NIC) @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ Recommended System Requirements * Multi-core CPU: 64bit (Intel EMT64 or AMD64), + ** for use in a virtual machine, activate Intel VT/AMD-V CPU flag -* 4 GB RAM +* 4 GiB RAM * Bootable CD-ROM-drive or USB boot support @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ Recommended System Requirements * 1 Gbps Ethernet network interface card (NIC) -* Storage: at least 8 GB free disk space, best set up with redundancy, +* Storage: at least 8 GiB free disk space, best set up with redundancy, using a hardware RAID controller with battery backed write cache (``BBU'') or ZFS. ZFS is not compatible with hardware RAID controllers. For best performance, use enterprise-class SSDs with power loss protection. -- 2.39.2