From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39119B2DB for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 16:05:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8CC38204A0 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 16:05:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 16:05:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B336446E47 for ; Wed, 24 May 2023 15:57:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Wagner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 15:56:48 +0200 Message-Id: <20230524135649.934881-42-l.wagner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20230524135649.934881-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> References: <20230524135649.934881-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.150 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DMARC_MISSING 0.1 Missing DMARC policy KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE -0.01 - Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH v2 pve-manager 41/42] ui: backup: disable notification mode selector for now X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:05:45 -0000 I think it's best to not expose the notification channel feature until we have at least a basic managment GUI for endpoints/channels. Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner --- www/manager6/dc/Backup.js | 1 + www/manager6/window/Backup.js | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/manager6/dc/Backup.js b/www/manager6/dc/Backup.js index 997b0393..56e70121 100644 --- a/www/manager6/dc/Backup.js +++ b/www/manager6/dc/Backup.js @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@ Ext.define('PVE.dc.BackupEdit', { bind: { value: '{notificationMode}', }, + disabled: true, }, { xtype: 'pveNotificationChannelSelector', diff --git a/www/manager6/window/Backup.js b/www/manager6/window/Backup.js index 8c8cd7d8..b659c582 100644 --- a/www/manager6/window/Backup.js +++ b/www/manager6/window/Backup.js @@ -53,8 +53,8 @@ Ext.define('PVE.window.Backup', { notificationChannelSelector.setHidden(mailSelected); mailtoField.setHidden(!mailSelected); } - } - + }, + disabled: true, }); const keepNames = [ -- 2.30.2