From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A60A924EC for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:34:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3AA3618F71 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 65DBF45D14 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:48 +0100 (CET) From: Fiona Ebner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20230321123345.128141-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES proxmox-{resource-scheduling, perl-rs}] fix scoring issue with overcommitted node X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:34:19 -0000 The current algorithm is blind in cases where the static node stats are the same and there is (at least) one node that is overcommitted when compared to the others. The problem is that using the linear average produces the same values for the alternatives (except for the overcommitted node). Fix it by using a nonlinear average. The patch proxmox-perl-rs 2/2 requires a build-dependency bump for proxmox-resource-scheduling. proxmox-resource-scheduling: Fiona Ebner (2): pve ha: fix scoring issue when a node is overcommitted compared to others pve ha: fix typo in comment src/pve_static.rs | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) proxmox-perl-rs: Fiona Ebner (2): pve: test: resource scheduling: use dedicated functions for tests pve: test: resource scheduling: add test with overcommitted node pve-rs/test/resource_scheduling.pl | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.30.2