From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A60A924EC
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:34:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3AA3618F71
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 65DBF45D14
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:33:41 +0100
Message-Id: <20230321123345.128141-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL -0.002 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH-SERIES proxmox-{resource-scheduling,
perl-rs}] fix scoring issue with overcommitted node
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:34:19 -0000
The current algorithm is blind in cases where the static node stats
are the same and there is (at least) one node that is overcommitted
when compared to the others.
The problem is that using the linear average produces the same values
for the alternatives (except for the overcommitted node). Fix it by
using a nonlinear average.
The patch proxmox-perl-rs 2/2 requires a build-dependency bump for
proxmox-resource-scheduling.
proxmox-resource-scheduling:
Fiona Ebner (2):
pve ha: fix scoring issue when a node is overcommitted compared to
others
pve ha: fix typo in comment
src/pve_static.rs | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
proxmox-perl-rs:
Fiona Ebner (2):
pve: test: resource scheduling: use dedicated functions for tests
pve: test: resource scheduling: add test with overcommitted node
pve-rs/test/resource_scheduling.pl | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2