From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317CA918EC for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 17:03:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 13AC51AB97 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 17:02:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com [94.136.29.106]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 17:02:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5C73345F10 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 17:02:52 +0100 (CET) From: Lukas Wagner To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 17:02:50 +0100 Message-Id: <20230208160250.651769-1-l.wagner@proxmox.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 AWL -0.239 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs] pveum: remove misleading 'additionally' in perm-modify description X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:03:23 -0000 'additionally' in this context is a bit misleading, as it suggests that e.g. 'VM.Allocate' AND 'Permissions.Modify' are needed, conflicting with the previous paragraph. Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner --- The ambiguity popped up in a recent support ticket. pveum.adoc | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/pveum.adoc b/pveum.adoc index 65d874a..24e903d 100644 --- a/pveum.adoc +++ b/pveum.adoc @@ -895,9 +895,9 @@ The `path` is a templated parameter (see `Permissions.Modify` privilege or, depending on the path, the following privileges as a possible substitute: + -* `/storage/...`: additionally requires 'Datastore.Allocate` -* `/vms/...`: additionally requires 'VM.Allocate` -* `/pool/...`: additionally requires 'Pool.Allocate` +* `/storage/...`: requires 'Datastore.Allocate` +* `/vms/...`: requires 'VM.Allocate` +* `/pool/...`: requires 'Pool.Allocate` + If the path is empty, `Permission.Modify` on `/access` is required. -- 2.30.2