From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F2A95CCF
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 11:18:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A2D87649A
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 11:18:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
[94.136.29.106])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 11:18:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DEFA245549
for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 20 Jan 2023 11:18:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 11:18:01 +0100
Message-Id: <20230120101802.92746-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0
AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
information. [replication.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common 1/2] replication: prepare: include
volumes without snapshots in the result
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>,
<mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:18:36 -0000
Note that PVE::Storage::volume_snapshot_info() will fail when a volume
does not exist, so no non-existing volume will end up in the result
(prepare() is only called with volumes that should exist).
This makes it possible to detect a volume without snapshots in the
result of prepare(), and as a consequence, replication will now also
fail early in a situation where source and remote volume both exist,
but (at least) one of them doesn't have any snapshots.
Such a situation can happen, for example, by deleting and re-creating
a volume with the same name on the source side without running
replication after deletion.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
src/PVE/Replication.pm | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/PVE/Replication.pm b/src/PVE/Replication.pm
index 469ca19..f9d454d 100644
--- a/src/PVE/Replication.pm
+++ b/src/PVE/Replication.pm
@@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ sub prepare {
my $local_snapshots = {};
my $cleaned_replicated_volumes = {};
foreach my $volid (@$volids) {
+ $local_snapshots->{$volid} = {};
+
my $info = PVE::Storage::volume_snapshot_info($storecfg, $volid);
my $removal_ok = !defined($snapname) || $info->{$snapname};
--
2.30.2