From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B42F941EB
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:52:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7B3CAA6E7
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:52:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (proxmox-new.maurer-it.com
 [94.136.29.106])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:52:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by proxmox-new.maurer-it.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A8C9D44ED4
 for <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:52:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:52:41 +0100
Message-Id: <20230110125243.176153-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.022 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS 0.01 Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict Alignment
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 URIBL_BLOCKED 0.001 ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See
 http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more
 information. [zfspoolplugin.pm]
Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage 1/3] zfs: list zvol: return empty hash
 rather than undef
X-BeenThere: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel.lists.proxmox.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel>, 
 <mailto:pve-devel-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:52:47 -0000

Avoids the need for the fallback for the (only existing) caller.

Note that the old my $list = (); is a rather intransparent way of
assigning undef.

Suggested-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
---
 PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm
index f829b86..bce360f 100644
--- a/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage/ZFSPoolPlugin.pm
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ sub free_image {
 sub list_images {
     my ($class, $storeid, $scfg, $vmid, $vollist, $cache) = @_;
 
-    my $zfs_list = $class->zfs_list_zvol($scfg) // {};
+    my $zfs_list = $class->zfs_list_zvol($scfg);
 
     my $res = [];
 
@@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ sub zfs_list_zvol {
 	$scfg->{pool},
     );
     my $zvols = zfs_parse_zvol_list($text);
-    return undef if !$zvols;
+    return {} if !$zvols;
 
-    my $list = ();
+    my $list = {};
     foreach my $zvol (@$zvols) {
 	# The "pool" in $scfg is not the same as ZFS pool, so it's necessary to filter here.
 	next if $scfg->{pool} ne $zvol->{pool};
-- 
2.30.2